structural testimonial injustice

📖 Definitions

concedes the possibility of a structural variant but provides principled reasons for focusing on the transactional variant alone, independent of structural considerations (that is injujstice when it happens is internal to the self-understanding of the participants) (Wanderer, 2017, p.34)

💡 Examples

• Wanderer dismiss as a genuine category
• and it is defended as a legit category by (Anderson 2012).

🔗 Relations

• part of: testimonial injustice

📚 References

• Wanderer, Jeremy. 2017. "Varieties of Testimonial Injustice" in Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., Pohlhaus, G., & Jr (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. Routledge: 27-40 https: doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043;

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2012. "Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions", Social Epistemology 26.2: 163–173.

---